Because you're comparing apples to oranges! That is why you should study a reloading handbook Before you begin or you are gonna hurt on your own or another person.
With near max hundreds I usually again it off when changing to a brand new number of powder. Years in the past there was discuss on the web of huge variation in RE19. My .338 Winchester at time chrono graphed hundreds at fewer than max cost higher in velocity than what the book experienced for max loads.
Posted September 15, 2009 You'll be able to evaluate a melt away chart to find out what powder has comparable burn characteristics, but contemplating you're going to uncover a unique powder that usually IS a selected powder is really a risky method.
ADI is quite specific With all the wording of their Powder equivalents table Take note! Nowhere tend to be the phrases "the same or equal" as a lot of Wire posters have stated - including your self!
Let me pose this ... ought to the Wire demand no postings of equivalent or are they precisely the same powders as may be the rule for powder expenses?
I use a Hornady Lock & Load (digital) bench scale plus a Lee beam scale. I have discovered both equally scales to become correct and reputable to in just one/ten of the grain as marketed. In contrast both of those powder measures rely on the kind and coarseness with the powder made use of for his or her precision.
The Hodgdon Powder Company commenced in 1952 as B.E. Hodgdon, Inc., and has grown to be A serious distributor of smokeless powder to the ammunition sector, and also for people who load their own ammunition by hand. The business's corporate Workplace and manufacturing amenities can be found in Kansas, United states of america.
Gradual burning powders can take about fifteen" of bullet journey to entirely burn off up. These powders are Employed in magnum revolver masses given that they continue on to press a HP38 powde bullet more quickly and speedier right up until it ultimately leaves the muzzle.
Jim Watson said: Hodgdon bought the distributorship for Winchester branded powders in 2006, so HP38 and W231 probably received packed out of the same output operates about that time. Click on to broaden...
If i am reading through your article ideal, you say hp38 is similar to bullseye??? that getting claimed, The main reason why its notthat well known could well be (to me) an increased or sharp recoil impulse instead of other powders around, for that 40 I am making use of WST that's softer emotion recoilwise by a mile, with the 9mm minor I am making use of VV 3n37 and w/ the 147 grain its far more of the push than sharp recoil
When it really is legitimate that they are generally employed for a similar application (they do have near exactly the same burn off price), they're not what I (or most folks) would visualize as equal, they usually definitely will not be interchangeable at a similar powder weights.
I would move to Common or One of a kind which has a nod to Common only as it flows far better and even more consistantly than Special out of most powder steps.
Just a quick assumed, but at 38 Unique velocities I've hardly ever shot anything at all more durable than straight wheel weights at a bhn close to eleven. I might think anything at all more challenging would not seal in the throat effectively.
That is an older thread, you may not receive a reaction, and will be hp-38 powder reviving an outdated thread. Remember to look at developing a new thread.